2,031. Reference : MM-1-21-580

Observation at Saraphi District Office

| March 20, 1969. A woman came to the district regarding selling water at the district office. But an official said that it was not her business. Mangkhom received good service from the waiter, even though he said that he was only an intern. | Punch card

2,032. Reference : MM-1-21-581

Observations at District Administration Office of Saraphi

| March 21, 1969. First, a chief complained to his assistant district officer regarding the drilling for groundwater, as there was no running water. There was not enough budget for a new drill. Second, a man came to complain about the water shortage because the dam in Mae Tang did not release any water; therefore Saraphi District had no water. The Chief District Officer was asked to manage water resources, but he said that it was outside of his duties. Third, a man asked for the day when he had to pay the taxes for land. Fourth, a man complained about the water shortage. The Chief District Officer had said that the water resources were deficient in all areas, even in the watershed areas. March 21, 1969. RA observed and noted the following. First, a woman asked for census record because her child needed it for study enrollment. There was a similar case, but the staff could not find the document. Second, the Sub-district Chief or “Kamnan” paid taxes on land and complained that they were expensive. But the officials said that the land value was quite high as well. Third, a man asked for a copy of birth registration because the date inscribed on his birth certificate and in another certificate did not match. Fourth, a sub-district headman came to ask about taxes on the land for his villagers. Although the staff explained politely, he could not understand. Fifth, a man came to complain about the water resource management for his land. After the complaint, there still was no water. | Punch card

2,033. Reference : MM-1-21-582

Prakong, the chief district officer

| March 10, 1969. Moerman talked to Prakong about conflict management. He listened to both sides, and then he decided to submit the case to the judge. Two days ago there were two cases in which he had taken a decision. One concerned land invasion. It must be reported to the police. Another case was regarding a man who had gotted woman pregnant and then refused to marry her. Prakong helped settle the conflict and asked him to pay damages to the woman. | Punch card

2,034. Reference : MM-1-21-583

In the Army base: the case of a young teacher

| A private had married a woman. But the family of the woman did not like the man, so he wanted to divorce even both of them were still in love. Bodin advised that if the private wanted to divorce her, there should be a reason, for example the woman was unfaithful. | Punch card

2,035. Reference : MM-1-21-584

At the Army base: a motorbike accident at Tha Pae

| July 31, 1969. Two privates were riding a motorcycle and a car had crashed into them. They were wounded and brought to the hospital. Later, they were all called to the police station and the soldiers were told not to compromise by accepting money from the driver of the car. They were accused as culprits, and the soldiers were very angry and refused the money. They informed their captain about the accident, and he came to consult Bodin. He thought that the police might not force the privates to settle the conflict by receiving money without an investigation. Finally, the captain decided to contact the police to ask for an investigation and witness identification. | Punch card

2,036. Reference : MM-1-21-585

At the Army base: Sergent Winit

| July 14, 1969. Sergent Winit consulted Bodin about his land. His father had inherited the land. Later, his uncle took the document to change the name of his father into the name of his the uncle, to make a sale without his father’s acknowledgment. His father had since passed away, and his uncle sold the land with right of redemption for the amount of 60,000 Baht. Currently its value had risen up to 80,000 Baht. But he would not receive the 20,000 baht of difference to settle the case. He thought that the borrower and his uncle might be responsible for an act of swindling. | Punch card

2,037. Reference : MM-1-21-586

The court registrar acting as broker

| 18 Jun 1969 Bodin secretly heard a woman talk to a court registrar and he made the recommendation to go to Prawin’s law firm. It was regarding a court filing in which a Chinese company in Chiang Mai (?) was suing her. The court registrar secretly read the lawsuit, and he recommended her to see the lawyer, so that he would gain commission from the attorney. | Punch card

2,038. Reference : MM-1-21-587

An official of provincial administration revealed illegal possession of gun

| June 10, 1969. A guard carried a gun. An officer of the district authorities commented that the guard should keep the gun in secret, and the police would not cause a problem if the chief district officer guaranteed it. However, the district administration officer refused to do so. The police recorded the incident in the daily log and would proceed to the next step. Suthon went to see the PP to reduce the penalty for the accused by requesting the payment of a fine instead of imprisonment. | Punch card

2,039. Reference : MM-1-21-588

Settlement of conflict at the police station of Saraphi district

| May 6, 1969. Mr. Seang Niam had hired people to paint a building and did not pay their wages. The employees lodged a complaint about him at the police station. The police had called Seang Niam to settle the conflict more than five times, and he had refused to comply. Later, after the sixth call Seang Niam came and said that he had no money to pay and the cheque paid formerly had bounced. The police gave notice to Seang Niam that if he did not pay the employees, he would have to be imprisoned. Seang Niam asked them to not complain about the bounced cheque. Later, he brought the money to pay the employees, and Bodin recorded it as evidence. | Punch card

2,040. Reference : MM-1-21-589

Dispute over land at Cho: IE:

| March 8, 1969. The families of two brothers were the family Ae and the family Nang Ta. They were in conflict because both sides had built fences on the edge of each other’s property. It lead to a problem that could not be resolved. In addition, they were unable to settle the management of land that had been inherited from their parents because there was no testament. The family Nang Ta threatened the Family Ae to close the door to his house. In fact the family Ae's house was located behind the family Nang's house, so it was a common entrance. There were other incidents, which had caused the members of the two families not to talk to each other. However, the negotiation of inheritance had to be by the consent of both parties. | Punch card