1,811. Reference : MM-1-21-451

Lawyers : Somboon Arayanggoon.

| December 3, 1968. Somboon Arayanggoon was a class 1 lawyer and was trying to join the election in Chiang Mai. In Moerman's opinion, Somboon had an impressive personality. On February 14, 1969 Somboon stood as a candidate for the election in Lamphun province, but he lost the election. Although he felt sorry to not be elected, he was glad to not have to follow through on the promises he gave to people during his campaign, because he was not confident about accomplishing the goals. He mainly received cases regarding civil suits and land. | Punch card

1,812. Reference : MM-1-21-452

Lawyers. Prasit

| January 11, 1969. Prasit was a private lawyer for Kraisri Nimmanahaeminda. | Punch card

1,813. Reference : MM-1-21-453

Lawyers, Somphon.

| December 16. Sompol was a judge, and formerly he was a soldier and a friend of Field Marshal Thanom Kittikachorn. He often criticized the authoritarian tendencies of the government. Vichit told Moerman that Sompol was left wing. | Punch card

1,814. Reference : MM-1-21-454

Lawyers' reputations.

| December 7. In Chiang Mai there were 25 trained lawyers, but there were only 10 who worked actively. Once trained lawyers had more experience, they would break off and set up their own office. | Punch card

1,815. Reference : MM-1-21-455

Lawyers in chiangmai.

| December 6, 1968. At the Court, Prawit pointed out Moerman, and then he said that Moerman loved to ask pithy questions (?). | Punch card

1,816. Reference : MM-1-21-456

Khanet goes to jail to meet a client.

| April 1, 1969. Moerman accompanied Khanet to meet his client at the prison. He was arrested on the charge of assault. Moerman monitored the mannerisms and inquiries of Khanet and took notes. Khanet's client claimed that he was not at the scene of the incident. However Khanet believed that his client was not being forthright with all od the details. | Punch card

1,817. Reference : MM-1-21-457

Clients come to Sithon's office.

| February 20, 1969. A client of Sithon had signed a contract to lease land to Khamsing for 3 years, but he wanted the land back. He could not terminate the contract, and was required to pay damages to the amount of 700 baht to Khamsing. However, he did not have as much money as was needed, and he went to Sithon to seek advice. | Punch card

1,818. Reference : MM-1-21-458

Cases in Prawin's office.

| January 26, 1969. There were two people who came to consult Suthon at the law firm regarding chasing people invading their land. In another case, a person came to consult regarding the details of specific contracts. | Punch card

1,819. Reference : MM-1-21-459

Lawyers Sutham.

| March 13, 1969. A woman came to the Sutham law firm to consult on the issue of her husband, who had a minor wife. He was refusing to pay the living allowance for herse and her children. She wanted Sutham to contact her husband, who she felt was responsible for providing an allowance for child rearing and for herself. If he did not agree to this, she would submit to file it in court. | Punch card

1,820. Reference : MM-1-21-460

Cases in Pradit's office : a minor's land as collateral for a loan.

| March 29, 1969. Pradit held a draft loan agreement to guarantee land. A problem occurred because the borrower had not repayed the loan and was deceased. The creditor wanted to seize land as collateral, but his brother had ineherited the land. However, as he was still a minor, he could be signatory to a contract. A cadaster official encouraged the boy's mother to sell their land to him, instead of allowing the creditor to settle the debt. Pradit needed to clear up the case. | Punch card