Initial pleading and applications to continue arrest while under investigation.

February 17, 1969. Moerman observed a trial where Winit benched for a practicum judge. His sentence reduced the imprisonment for three minors (under the age of 20 years) who had offended. And he reduced the penalty for another defendant who had no history of prior offenses.

Interview with Thanin.

February 5 and 7, 1969. Moerman interviewed Tanin on several topics such as 1) the jury system at the trial was not quite effective. This was due to the belief of Thai people that the power to judge stayed with the king of Thailand. Moreover, Thai society was full of corruption and reliant on a system of personal rapport. If the jury knew the accused, the lawsuit may have been settled lawsuit siding with the offender. 2) It might be necessary to conduct training for the judge’s assistant on how to gain the truth from a testimony. 3) The brief was cut off so that the police would more easily understand.

Interview with Acan Wimolsiri.

February 7, 1969. Moerman interviewed Wimonsiri on a variety of topics of interest such as 1) The importance of the Chiang Mai Provincial Court. There were a number of lawsuits and a lot of foreigners dwelt in the area. 2) Wimonsiri has served as Secretary of the Minister and assisted to answer questions in the Parliament. She actually moved to monitoring public opinion on the work of the court. 3) The relocation of judges was a result of complaints, or arose out of conflicts between judges and local authorities.

Interview with Bill Klaussner.

February 3 and 7, 1969. Moerman interviewed Klausner on various topics such as 1) Permission for a second class lawyer to file international suits, as first class lawyers were able to. 2) In the Ministry of Justice, there were some conflicts over the budget between the judicial departments and the ministers. 3) The judge mainly accepted the preliminary reports that the police submitted for consideration of the case, but sometimes the police themselves accepted bribes to write the reports in favor of one party. 4) Marut and Klausner planned to provide legal assistance to the public. They also published legal books for lawyers. 5) Klausner commented on the role of young people (like Marut) in the Law Society and the independence of the Supreme Court in deciding the case.

Lawyers on the police.

14 Jan. Suthon provided information about the corrupt performance of police in their duties such as (1) Threatening by force of suspects during an investigation. (2) Invented information leading to the arrest of the accused. (3) Graft to fall cases. (4) The indifference of officials towards the complaints made by members of the public, unless they received bribes.

Interview with Dr.Jongjit Satcawanit, head of pathology dept, mo cho.

May 22, 1969. Bodin interviewed Yongyut on variety of topics such as 1) His assignment to check the carbon powder and traces of the bullets on the case of Mrs. Chan Thiam. 2) They also discussed the matter of the wage the accused obtained on the Mrs. Chan murder and the wage for another case of assassination. 3) In the case of assassination, often the accused would be hired from an influential person (such as police, gambler and opium trader). 4) The son of Mrs. Chan suspected his father of hiring someone to murder his own mother. 5) The authentication of Yongyut as an expert in forensic intelligence.

Police on orimo.

18 June 1969. Moerman interviewed the police chief at Nan provincial police station on various topics such as 1) Field Marshal Thanom Kittikachorn launched a policy to strictly crackdown on wrongdoers. 2) The information about the process of smuggling and deforestation in Lampang and Lamphun. 3) The majority of cases occurring in Nan involved smuggling and deforestation. There were small cases involving the theft of domesticated animals, which were stolen and eaten or sold, as had happened in other provinces.

Lawyers on the police.

March 28, 1969. Suthon’s view was that the use of police power to oppress the people caused the communist intrusion. Additionally, only 30% of the U.S. grants were distributed to the Thai public. The rest went to corrupt officials.

Js on police investigation.

27 February 1969. The police gained more power after the law change. They often arrested suspects over infractions of the law. Most of the defendants and witnesses were afraid of pleading during the police investigation. However, they felt comfortable enough to argue at the bar.